Scott Edelman
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Writing
    • Short Fiction
    • Books
    • Comic Books
    • Television
    • Miscellaneous
  • Editing
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • Videos

©2026 Scott Edelman

Help me learn more about who I was at 17

Posted by: Scott    Tags:  Dianetics, Scientology    Posted date:  November 27, 2015  |  4 Comments


On February 10, 1974, I was wandering midtown Manhattan when I was approached by a guy who asked me if I’d like to take a free personality test.

I was 17. I hadn’t yet started working for Marvel Comics, hadn’t yet met my wife, hadn’t sold any fiction, or done any of the others things that make me me. And in that moment, I had no idea that this was a opening gambit to get me to agree to learn more about Scientology.

But I was intrigued, and had a few hours to spare, so I figured … what could it hurt?

So I followed the clipboard-carrying street hawker to an office, where I rated 200 statements, indicating whether I agreed, disagreed, or was neutral about them. If you want to know my answers, here they are. Check them out!

AmericanPersonalityAnalysis2

Doesn’t tell you much, does it?

It doesn’t mean much to me either, I’d afraid—because I have no idea what questions prompted those answers. And the Internet has yet to provide me with any help, because a search on any of the identifying phrases on those sheets fails to turn up the specific questions which would go with the above grid.

My answers, once tabulated, resulted in the following visual expression of my personality.

AmericanPersonalityAnalysis1

Do you see that first pencilled-in dot on the line at the top of the chart, and how it’s closer to “Impulsive/Dispersed” than “Oriented/Self Controlled”? Because of that placement, I was advised I should start coming in once a week to be trained in Dianetics so I could become (or so I was told) less Impulsive.

I explained I liked being impulsive, and there was nothing wrong with that, but the tester insisted, no, no, no, don’t you see, we’ve got to get your dot further to the right. He seemed more concerned with the dot’s placement than with my actual life as it was being lived.

We went back and forth on this for quite awhile until I realized the only way to get out of there was to agree to do as he suggested and come back weekly for lessons … even though I had no plans to do so. At that point, he asked for a donation, but being a teenager, I had nothing more in my pocket than a subway token and a few coins. So I gave him what I had—probably less than 75 cents—and went on my way.

Leaving aside your opinions about Dianetics and Scientology—so please don’t fill up the comments section with them—do you have any idea how I can get my hands on that original questionnaire? I’d love to take the test all over again, compare the answers I’d give now to the answers I gave then, and learn how the arc of my life has changed me. I’ve tried to find a copy, but have been unsuccessful.

Will you succeed where I failed? Can you help me learn more about my 17-year-old self?





4 Comments for Help me learn more about who I was at 17


Tony Ortega

http://www.xenu.net/archive/oca/

    Scott

    Thanks! Wonder why my Internet searching failed to find that?

    Interesting that the test states, “If under 18, please, have parent or guardian sign,” which was not done back in 1974, even though I was clearly 17. Is it known what year they started including that as part of the test?

    Also—how can I be sure the 200 questions posted on that site today are the same questions in the same order as I was given back in 1974? Has the test remained totally unchanged over the course of 40 years?

alice jena

this is a totally bogus test. Do not concern yourself with the original questions…The test is written to just “insist” that you need “help” from this cult. The fact that you walked away proves that you were and are brilliant; and have a wonderful personality…there that is what you need to know.

    Scott

    Oh, I’m aware that the final results of the test are meaningless, and that the chart on the reverse, visualizing my answers, exists only to convince me to sign up for classes. I’m not looking for any great wisdom from that aspect of the test. However …

    I still think there’s much I can learn about my self by seeing how I answered individual questions then vs. now. For example, how I responded to a question such as question, “Do you find it easy to express your emotions?” at age 17 vs. age 60 would make for an interesting comparison.

    And thank you for complimenting my personality! 😉



  • Follow Scott


  • Recent Tweets

    • Waiting for Twitter... Once Twitter is ready they will display my Tweets again.
  • Latest Photos


  • Search

  • Tags

    anniversary Balticon birthdays Bryan Voltaggio Capclave comics Cons context-free comic book panel conventions DC Comics dreams Eating the Fantastic food garden horror Irene Vartanoff Len Wein Man v. Food Marie Severin Marvel Comics My Father my writing Nebula Awards Next restaurant obituaries old magazines Paris Review Readercon rejection slips San Diego Comic-Con Scarecrow science fiction Science Fiction Age Sharon Moody Stan Lee Stoker Awards StokerCon Superman ukulele Video Why Not Say What Happened Worldcon World Fantasy Convention World Horror Convention zombies