Scott Edelman
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Writing
    • Short Fiction
    • Books
    • Comic Books
    • Television
    • Miscellaneous
  • Editing
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • Videos

©2025 Scott Edelman

Can someone please tell me when Avengers #1 and X-Men #1 REALLY went on sale?

Posted by: Scott    Tags:  comics, Marvel Comics, The Avengers, X-Men    Posted date:  September 12, 2013  |  7 Comments


I can remember exactly where I was when Avengers #1 and X-Men #1 went on sale, because it was the same day, I only had 12 cents on me, and could therefore only buy one.

I had to choose between them. Can you feel my pain? Imagine my horror?

AvengersXMen1

It was 1963, and I was 8 years old. I was in Joe and Morty’s Brooklyn candy store on Avenue P a few blocks off Ocean Parkway. I visited there nearly every day, not just for comics, but to stay fueled on egg creams and cherry lime rickeys, and to pick up those unfiltered Lucky Strikes my mother needed.

In any case, though I’m 100% certain where I encountered those issues, I can’t say for sure when I encountered them. Only that it wasn’t September 10. Because school had not begun, it was still summer, and in any case, though both books were cover-dated September, comics always went on sale in advance of their cover dates, that date only being an indication to the retailer when comics should come off sale.

And yet …

Wired ran a celebratory article the other day in which it claimed that, “Today marks the golden birthday of two classic Marvel teams — the X-Men and the Avengers, both of whom made their comics debut on September 10, 1963, drawn by Jack Kirby and scripted by Stan Lee.”

And even Marvel itself claims September 10, 1963 as the on-sale date for both issues.

But … how can this be? And why would such a claim even be made? The concept of an on-sale date being earlier than a cover date isn’t a new invention. As Wikipedia puts it:

The general practice of most mainstream comic book companies since the creation of the comic book in the 1930s was to date individual issues putting the name of a month (and much later the year as well) on the cover which was generally two months after the actual release date. For example, a 1951 issue of Superman which had the cover date of July would have been published two months earlier from that date in the month of May, generally speaking. In 1973 the discrepancy between the cover date and the publishing date went from two months to three months. In 1989 the cover date and publishing date discrepancy was changed back to two months, though generally each comic book company now uses its own system.

So—those issues of Avengers #1 and X-Men #1 most certainly did not go on sale September 10. I’ve no idea why anyone claims they did.

Which raises the question—what’s the real date the world first saw these characters? What’s the real date I had to choose?

Any answers out there?

Oh, and if you’re wondering which comic I chose … it was the Avengers, because it featured characters I already knew and loved. But don’t worry, I was able to scrape up another 12 cents so I could come back later and buy X-Men #1, too!





7 Comments for Can someone please tell me when Avengers #1 and X-Men #1 REALLY went on sale?


Robert Stanley Martin

I believe both went on sale in June or early July at the latest. Marvel’s cover dating was generally three months ahead, although sometimes it was as little as two. For instance, Fantastic Four #1 has a November 1961 cover date, but its official on-sale date was August 8. On the other hand, Amazing Fantasy #15 has an August 1962 cover date, but its official on-sale date was June 5.

    Scott

    So that being said—why do you think Marvel lists the date as it does?

ShadZ

According to Mike’s Amazing World of Comics (http://www.dcindexes.com/), a website that has done lots of research on on-sale dates, they both went on-sale on July 2 1963

    Scott

    Thanks! Any idea why Wired gets it wrong? And Marvel, too?

      ShadZ

      I don’t know, but Mark Evanier says it is an old error that has cropped up before (http://www.newsfromme.com/2013/09/15/blind-dates/), So in this case, it could just be bad research — trusting the first reference you find and not checking.

        Scott

        Yes, I saw that. But with Marvel getting it wrong, and that being the first place many will go for their info, the error is bound to propagate.

Tho

Comic are published several months before their release date(this is still true today) but back then companies didn’t care about enforcing street dates. So if a retailer received an issue early they put it out early, and no questions were asked. The reason Marvel uses their date system this way is because they set the release date to a specific time and whatever the set is what they’ll use for their records.



  • Follow Scott


  • Recent Tweets

    • Waiting for Twitter... Once Twitter is ready they will display my Tweets again.
  • Latest Photos


  • Search

  • Tags

    anniversary Balticon birthdays Bryan Voltaggio Capclave comics Cons context-free comic book panel conventions DC Comics dreams Eating the Fantastic food garden horror Irene Vartanoff Len Wein Man v. Food Marie Severin Marvel Comics My Father my writing Nebula Awards Next restaurant obituaries old magazines Paris Review Readercon rejection slips San Diego Comic-Con Scarecrow science fiction Science Fiction Age Sharon Moody Stan Lee Stoker Awards StokerCon Superman ukulele Video Why Not Say What Happened Worldcon World Fantasy Convention World Horror Convention zombies