Scott Edelman
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Writing
    • Short Fiction
    • Books
    • Comic Books
    • Television
    • Miscellaneous
  • Editing
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • Videos

©2025 Scott Edelman

Please help me dispel a Marvel Comics myth

Posted by: Scott    Tags:  Jack Kirby, Marvel Comics    Posted date:  May 28, 2012  |  9 Comments


Do you have easily accessible copies of Captain America 202, 203, 205-207, or Black Panther 2? Are they reading rather than slabbed copies? Would you be willing to scan the letters columns and send me .jpgs?

If so, you might be able to help me dispel a Marvel Comics myth.

Yesterday, I posted a response to Robert Steibel’s commentary on my post of last year in which I recoiled from Jack Kirby’s mid-’70s run on Captain America.

Though he didn’t bring up the following point in his essay, Steibel and I exchanged a few emails, and in one of them he claimed that Marvel staffers were weighting the letters columns against Kirby in an attempt to orchestrate a campaign within fandom to get The King kicked off the books he was writing at the time.

I’d never heard such an accusation before, but when I searched online, I found that he didn’t originate the concept, that it had been comics hearsay for quite awhile, and that some even claimed staffers were creating fraudulent letters to make the Kirby backlash seem even worse. For example, Jordan Raphael and Tom Spurgeon reported on this in their 2003 biography, Stan Lee and the Rise and Fall of the American Comic Book.

The thing is, though the charge of faking negative letters has been bandied about, it all seems to be vague rumor and speculation. I’ve yet to see anyone point at a specific column and say that such-and-such a letter was cobbled together by an Assistant Editor.

Since I only just heard the charge for the first time this weekend, it took a day for the idea to sink in, and for me to realize—

Wait a minute! I was the one who wrote many of the letters columns that appeared in Kirby’s books. I’m the one being accused of fakery!

How do I know for sure? Look around at the images surrounding these words. I kept all my Marvel invoices from my years working in the Bullpen, partially out of nostalgia, partially so I could keep track of which uncredited work was mine, such as letters columns and splash pages for the British reprint books.

So … if you do have copies of those comics I mentioned above, and would like to help tickle my memory by putting copies of the letters columns from those issues in front of me, I’d greatly appreciate it. I’d like to see these letters I supposedly cooked up to derail The King’s career.

Keep in mind, though—just because a letter was negative, doesn’t mean it was faked. I printed plenty of negative letters in the Captain Marvel columns when I was writing the book, because I’ve always believed all opinions should get fair representation, even when they diss me.

I’m intrigued by what those ancient columns might reveal.

Here’s how to get in touch with me.





9 Comments for Please help me dispel a Marvel Comics myth


George Bush (not that one)

You sure sound paranoid.

    Scott

    Ah, but remember what they say about paranoia — just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean someone isn’t out to get you.

    If people were spreading untruths about you, I’m sure you’d want to disprove them, too. And based on one of the comments to my post that follows this one, I wasn’t the only Marvel Assistant Editor at the time who felt a need to speak out.

mike fifty-nine

i feel it would help if you came out and talked about the other staffers and who they were and what you remember

i remember reading the letter columns and they left a bad taste in my mouth then that has grown much worse now

kirby was what? 55-60 then? he built marvel and people were calling him a hack?

letter columns were faked to make kirby look bad based on some staffer’s hatred of kirby?

    Scott

    Please check out the actual letters columns here and then tell me if you still think they were negative. Any more positive and they’d be hagiography. And I don’t believe I ever called him a hack—it’s just that though he was a brilliant artist and idea man, he was a severely limited wordsmith.

      walt kovacs

      can you post every letter column, cuz its easier than digging into my comic boxes.

      i collected everything kirby. i enjoyed his stories and the word balloons. im sorry you didnt

      i do recall giving up on comics for a few years, not because of the writing, but because of the bad inking and coloring jobs…still bought everything kirby though.

George Bush (not that one)

Its well known what was going on at Marvel. People hung up pics from Kirby’s comics and wrote negative things on them. There were many negative letters published during this time in Kirby’s books .People in the office even sent “please retire” letters to Jack on Marvel stationery. I’m not saying YOU did any of this, but it happened. No one spread any untruths about you.

Jon Hansen

I’ve got the Captain America DVD with the PDFs they put out a couple years ago, before they decided to go to the online version. If you still need them, I can send them.

Jon Hansen

Never mind, just saw the follow up post.

    Scott

    Thanks anyway!



  • Follow Scott


  • Recent Tweets

    • Waiting for Twitter... Once Twitter is ready they will display my Tweets again.
  • Latest Photos


  • Search

  • Tags

    anniversary Balticon birthdays Bryan Voltaggio Capclave comics Cons context-free comic book panel conventions DC Comics dreams Eating the Fantastic food garden horror Irene Vartanoff Len Wein Man v. Food Marie Severin Marvel Comics My Father my writing Nebula Awards Next restaurant obituaries old magazines Paris Review Readercon rejection slips San Diego Comic-Con Scarecrow science fiction Science Fiction Age Sharon Moody Stan Lee Stoker Awards StokerCon Superman ukulele Video Why Not Say What Happened Worldcon World Fantasy Convention World Horror Convention zombies