{"id":12816,"date":"2008-04-30T08:14:58","date_gmt":"2008-04-30T12:14:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/?p=12816"},"modified":"2014-01-14T15:55:24","modified_gmt":"2014-01-14T20:55:24","slug":"scott-edelman-media-whore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/2008\/04\/30\/scott-edelman-media-whore\/","title":{"rendered":"Scott Edelman, Media Whore"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I just received a review copy of the New Directions reissue of poet Kenneth Patchen&#8217;s <i>The Walking-Away World<\/i>.  I&#8217;m not sure why, since at first glance it seemed unlikely that I would have anything to say about the volume that would help publicize it.  The illustrated poetry inside is a far cry from science fiction or fantasy, and so I&#8217;m not sure what the PR department was thinking, since there&#8217;s no hook that would cause me to review the book in either <i>Science Fiction Weekly<\/i> or <i>SCI FI<\/i> magazine.<\/p>\n<p>Then I read the introduction, since I enjoy reading writing about writing, regardless of the genre.  It turned out to have been written by Jim Woodring, the cartoonist of the surreal wordless series <i>Frank<\/i>.  I can only assume that he was chosen because of the parallels between his work and the three picture-poems of Patchen&#8217;s which are gathered here.<\/p>\n<p>So the reason I&#8217;m sharing about <i>The Walking-Away World<\/i> is due to  an anecdote Woodring shares in his introduction, one which relates to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediabistro.com\/galleycat\/authors\/authors_behaving_badly_82556.asp\" target=\"_blank\">the recent brouhaha concerning the proper way to respond to bad reviews<\/a>.  Since I have no one-star Amazon reviews of my work and therefore can&#8217;t respond to this fiasco <a href=\"http:\/\/scalzi.com\/whatever\/?p=685\" target=\"_blank\">the way John Scalzi did<\/a>, I figure this is the least I can do.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Based on this excerpt, Patchen had the right idea of it:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He responded once to all the negative criticism with an act of almost masochistic toughness: on the inside dust jacket of his book <i>Cloth of the Tempest<\/i>, he compiled not a collection of laudatory blurbs but some of the most egregious attacks on his work. Under the heading &#8220;WHAT SOME CRITICS HAVE SAID OF PATCHEN&#8217;S POETRY,&#8221; we read:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The biggest collection of arrant nonsense ever printed in America.&#8221;<i>&#151;The Springfield (Mass.) Republican<\/i><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Patchen is not a serious poet. And his fulsome self-indulgence, combined with the continual intrusion of a personality that insists on talking, singing, weeping, fighting, and cooing to itself, is very trying &#8230; &#8220;<i>&#151;The Nation<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are two more. Needless to say they had the effect of making his fans feel even more devoted to their talking, singing, weeping, fighting  and cooing hero.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve always agreed with the above method.  When I was writing the <i>Captain Marvel<\/i> comic book back in the &#8217;70s, and received a letter from a reader saying that he was glad that Jim Starlin was gone and if only I would also leave the book  his life would be complete, I was amused, and saved that letter like a badge of honor.  And when I was editing <i>SCI FI Universe<\/i> in the &#8217;90s, and received a letter calling me a media whore, I not only published it but had a business card mocked up not only to print in the magazine&#8217;s letters column, but also to carry around and hand out. <\/p>\n<p>The proper way to respond to such reviews and criticism is to laugh them off.  These things only hurt if we let them hurt.  Why can&#8217;t people see that?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I just received a review copy of the New Directions reissue of poet Kenneth Patchen&#8217;s The Walking-Away World. I&#8217;m not sure why, since at first glance it seemed unlikely that I would have anything to say about the volume that would help publicize it. The illustrated poetry inside is a far cry from science fiction [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[431],"class_list":["post-12816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-kenneth-patchen"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12816"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12816\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12818,"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12816\/revisions\/12818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scottedelman.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}